Home » Cars You Should Know »The Carchive » Currently Reading:

The Carchive: The Honda Aerodeck.

Chris Haining May 27, 2014 Cars You Should Know, The Carchive 19 Comments


Once more it’s time to plunge the sieve of clarity down into the sand bucket of the past, and see what nuggets of fascination can be shaken from the grit of time.

No theme whatsoever this week, just a random couple of pluckings from deep core of The Carchive. This one comes from the “forbidden fruits” section for all you who live West of the Atlantic.

It’s the Honda Aerodeck.

“In creating the Aerodeck, our engineers wanted to open up an entirely new dimension in motoring”

A New Dimension. Well, that was a bold claim. Whether in 1986 there was much call for the world of motoring to be turned upside down was possibly up for debate. Fortunately, the introduction of the Aerodeck barely registered on the world’s radar, let alone changing buying habits for ever.

The Aerodeck used existing Honda engineering but presented in a unique, two-box format. You could almost call it a longroof-coupe; there were two doors and a station-wagon style rear end. America received a far more conventional hatchback coupe instead, but the JDM and us spawny Yoorpeens could get our hands on the ‘Deck.

“…technology, quality and performance come together in a trend-setting combination”

Let’s take a look at the phrase “trend-setting”. There had been, of course, the Volvo P1800ES, then the Reliant Scimitar. All of these were three-door estate cars intended to serve up a blend of space and sportiness; to be honest the industry had been catering to this select audience for absolutely years; you could accuse the Chevy Nomad of being a part of it if you wanted to.

Pop-up headlamps on a station-wagon? Nope, the Lotus Elite did that in the ’70s. I guess we could say that the Honda was the first car to do whatever it does on a front-wheel-drive chassis. Apart from the Lancia Beta HPE. Dammit.

Scratch that, lets just give the Aerodeck plaudits for looking dang cool.

Among its unique featureset, aside from those pop-ups, were a pair of very long side doors and gently tapering roofline, which went towards providing “ unprecedented interior comfort and utility”, along with what was referred to as a “gull-wing tailgate”.

The name was accurate. The tailgate opened with a ten-inch chunk of roof, making for a much wider opening than had it been conventionally hinged. Marvellous; but then as if to completely nullify the whole concept the tailgate abruptly ended just above tail-lamp height, so heavy stuff had to be hauled way up over a loading sill. Those in need of a beast of burden needn’t sell their Volvo 245s just yet.

That “trend-setting” body yielded a drag co-efficient of 0.34, a good figure for the time but, with all the pop-up lamps and low bonnet-lines that the brochure crows about I’d have expected something even better.

The mechanical package, too, could have been pushed a bit further. This ’88 brochure presents just two models, both using the 12-valve two-litre engine; the EX model offering 106 hp fuelled through carburettors, or 122hp using the PGM-Fi for which Honda were rapidly becoming famous. There was no mention, certainly not on UK models, of either the 16V engine or 4-wheel-steer systems that the Prelude benefited from.
It’s a bit of a shame, really. The Aerodeck had double-wishbone suspension all round and was clearly set up to be great to drive. It seems daft to have ended up as a car which was neither fish nor fowl; not quite practical enough to be a station-wagon alternative, and not quite swift enough to become an everyday sports car.

“Form and function have never co-existed on better terms”

Whatever that means, it seems as if the recipe that Honda followed for the Aerodeck has been left out of most manufacturer’s cookery books since then. But then the two-door coupé / station wagon has never really been lobbied for. It would take a concerted effort starting with a unified global refusal to buy SUVs before Honda and others would even consider returning to these slim market niches. After this generation, the Aerodeck was never directly replaced. There was a Civic station wagon for which the Aerodeck name was revived, but frankly that was a pale imitation of the eccentric original.

We all yearn for a more colourful motoring landscape, but it’s no use if the customers aren’t there. It’s a fair bet that the die-hards of the ’80s who bought the Aerodeck the first time round were looking for a modern, reliable alternative to that Scimitar or Elite that they owned (or aspired to) in the past. Today, those customers simply don’t exist any more. Or if you do, then a) I’m sorry, and b) the lobbying starts here.

(Images are of original manufacturers promotional materials, photographed by me. Copyright remains property of Honda Motor Company. Aerodeck was a cool name. But I guess any future version couldn’t have pop-up headlamps anyway. So there’d be no point.)


    What is this?!?!?!!?

    • Manic_King

      "Fur", leather and fur shop. First it seemed like furore as in uproar, but no.

      • I'll be honest, it kinda made me angry when I read it. Then I calmed down.

  • nanoop

    I like these engineering heavy pamphlets, much cooler than these "emotion" flavored ones, about the heart and love and eagerness and such. Unless, engineered denotes an emotion now.

  • Manic_King

    Wasn't it known as Accord Aerodeck on some markets? Interior was mostly Accord IIRC.

    • Ate Up With Motor

      Yes, it was clearly identified as an Accord in Japan and the British press called it an Accord Aerodeck whether the brochure did or not. In Japan, the Aerodeck's trim levels lined up pretty directly with the sedan's, although the hatch offered no equivalent to the two cheapest grades of the sedan. There was a 2.0Si, though, which had the same twin-cam/16-valve B20A engine as the Prelude 2.0i-16.

  • Van_Sarockin

    I'm most upset that the US didn't get these. It's sort of like a supersized CRX.

    But, I'm also concerned about the sealing of that hatch. It didn't go so well for Studebaker.

    • Rover1

      But it's a Honda, so no leaks on my neighbours two owner sample.

  • This car is one of those that gets me bummed about being American.

    Thanks so much for the big come-down, ya Limey . . . and so soon after Memorial Day.

    • Van_Sarockin

      Perfidious Albion. They're like that y'know.

  • Land Ark

    This is a new one for me. And looking at it, my brain will not compute. I see the front and it instantly recognizes Accord but then when I look at the back is shouts "ABORT!" clearly thinking it's seeing a Civic. And then the rear shot makes it look like an Isuzu. Broken.

  • FuzzyPlushroom

    "Those in need of a beast of burden needn’t sell their Volvo 245s just yet."

    True, but one of these would look fantastic sitting on some set of '90s factory alloys beside my 245.

    I always liked the idea, and were it not for the hassle of importation I'd be chasing one.

  • Rover1

    Honda Accord Shooting Break, like the Reliant Scimitar GTE, Volvo 1800ES, Lancia Beta HPE or Aston Martin DB6 Radford
    <img src=";
    <img src=";
    <img src=";
    <img src=";

    • Manic_King

      *Shooting brake*

      Newer Bentley:

      <img src=";

      • Rover1

        I was initially tempted to say that you are entirely correct and apologise to you and the hoonetariat.
        But when I went to check Wikipedia, I got…..
        "Shooting-brake, shooting brake or shooting break is a car body style that has evolved through several distinct meanings over its history
        Shooting-brake originated as an early 19th century British term for a vehicle used to carry shooting parties with their equipment and game. The term brake was initially a chassis used to break in horses — and was subsequently used to describe a motorized vehicle."
        And Chambers Dictionary and Chambers 21st Century Dictionary and the Google company say that you're correct, it is 'brake'.
        But, the Concise Oxford Dictionary gives both spellings, break and brake. And Mercedes-Benz called their SLS Estate Show Car the Shooting Break Concept .
        So… Maybe we're both right ? Or it's like color and colour, culturally split. Quite the lovely paradoxical conundrum ?

        • topdeadcentre

          Everybody's right! Drinks and snacks all around!

  • FЯeeMan

    But for a pair of doors and the softening of some angles, that looks very similar to the Honda Tourer currently being campaigned by the Honda Yuasa factory team in the BTCC.
    <img src="; ,="" width="600">
    *image courtesy of btcc.net. They just don't know how generous they are.

  • Ate Up With Motor

    It never ceases to amaze me what lengths automotive PR people (or any marketing/PR people, really) will go to try to present a generally orthodox product as something revolutionary. In the Accord's case, it's not like a three-door Accord was a new concept — the Accord was a hatchback before it was a sedan, after all — so the only really novel elements here were a longer roof than on the previous generation and the roof-opening hatch, which would be a lot more impressive if it went down to bumper height, ideally without narrowing to the width of a coin slot between the taillights.

    I suspect part of the Aerodeck's marketing problem (it didn't sell well enough to merit an encore) was that in profile it really does look a great deal like the smaller three-door Civic — not a big selling point for a larger car costing about 50 percent more.

  • Eyo

    Iceland got a handful of those too. My mother had one when I was young, not that practical with kids being a two-door and a high trunk-sill. But never gave us problems, my sister bought it and drove it for a few years as well.
    Pictured in the 90's outside our house in Garðabær, Iceland:
    <img src="; width="600">


на сайте eurobud.com.ua